Comments on: Handcuffed to history in South Asia

By: yfgfyufyu

yfgfyufyu — Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:29:50 +0000

I (don’t) love how the UK gets off scot-free in its machinations. Even a curosry short study of the history and origin of these countries shows that the UK never let any of its “colonies” be FREE and INDEPENDENT. Yet, everyone blames Israel or USA their main patsies. DO some more research, people.

By: syma

syma — Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:48:01 +0000

@Bonnie Kashmir is important for Pakistan because all her rivers originate from Kashmir. Water resources are the core of this conflict not the people or land of Kashmir. And it does not matter what religion or caste the Kashmiri people belong to.

By: Bonnie

Bonnie — Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:40:28 +0000

“handcuffed to history”-

Yeah, I’ll say! The problems in India, were never so exacerbated as when islam was foced down their throats, by the invading arabs.

India already had the “Caste” system, they needed islam, too.

Admittedly, millions of Hindus converted to escape the system, but at the end, they wre left in the cul-de-sac..and their descendants, the same Race, fighting against their brethren ..moslem viciously slaughtering Hindu..Indian against Indian.

BAH!

Away with religion! Thet’s the whole problem. The religions!

Down with temples and mosques!!

Let each individual worship God, individually, their own way. Freely!

By: Gordon Duff

Gordon Duff — Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:17:46 +0000

We are wondering why there is no mention of the role Israel has taken in dictating policy in New Delhi? Given the mention of Kashmir or perhaps even the water issue and the Mumbai attacks, we need examine the players and intent with more interest.
If Germany were still driving across the steppes or shelling Sevastapol, I am sure their relationship with Russia would suffer.